Why is it that Internetsex takes up so much of the bandwidth, of the WWW? So-called 'Adult' web sites cater to the level of interest of the puberescent adolescent? Why are they so in demand? This web site explores the XXX on the WWW as a symptom, a cry for help, a kind of self-medication, by a culture which has not be allowed to reach adulthood and maturity by an imposed sexual embargo. By whom? For which purpose? ... Let's explore and find out. Understanding the symptom gives the solution.

2005-03-13

"'seen one, seen 'm all "

A book called BOOK (in Greek, Biblos, bible) formulates the thought that people were kicked out of paradise by putting on clothes.

(This idea suggests that Paradise is lost when you practice denial.)

Let's not beat around the bush (now, there's a nice figure of speach...): look up what is so intensely denied in the Western 'culture'. That what is said to be hidden ... sex.

(Is it not remarkable, that the church that says that paradise was lost by the wearing of fig leaves, prescribes fig leaves on all people...?)

If it is forbidden, then you can be sure that that really catches the attention.
So, let's look up, what is so forbidden.
Let's simply Google for vagina, penis, breast and clitoris, and see what we find.
Google has an excellend Image Search (and an excellent Scolar option also), so: go for it.


This is what you can find:

VAGINA:
43100 pictures, in 0,07 seconds.

Let's look at the first two rows; they both show the solution and the problem:

www.ottotheek.nl/ offers us big_vagina.jpg: this is a joke picture; the first anyone wishing to understand the vagina would find on the WWW.

kidney.niddk.nih.gov/spanish/pubs/bodydesign/ (in Spanish) shows you vagina.gif, a drawn out schematic view on the human vagina. As most medical pictures, it is all too schematic.

http://www.horseproblems.com.au/Photo clear that humans are not the only creatures with sexual problems: vagina wound2 (1).jpg

Hungary offers us the next insight: an instruction to reference points for naming parts of the human vagina: vagina.jpg, compliments of an 'intimshop'. An Infomercial.

www.darkdaughta.com/creation.html offers an artists impression of the vagina dentata.gif.
The vagina dentata is a misrepresentation: the old pictures, in Ireland, of a woman giving birth (showing the ruptured membranes) were not understood (in our sexually retarded culture) and described as 'having teeth in the vagina'.

24850037.jpg is the enigmatic name used by the website of the university of utah showing the image of vaginal genital warts. Yes, sexual diseases do exists, and that'll be a topic in itself, later.

the vagina.gif is put on mainstage (that is the name of the next web site) which proposes a hands-on approach for the vagina. In fact this is quite common sense thinking; as almost all people on the planet need to get a good feel for this, some time, in their life. But a picture does not really provide this.

dj1111-00.jpg is seemingly as cryptic a name for the GIF as the title before, but this time it is the picture of a reclined naked lady, on the front of a magazine cover, of which the web site link has expired.

And, yes then there are reams of further electronic pages with further pictures entitled vagina, with and without rings, as art works, as cut outs, as rubber replica's, as objects of phantasy (or is it superstition?), ... Sometimes the vagina is blurred away, sometimes brought in sharp focus. An image, of what is definitely a fake rubber vagina, is called 'realistic'.
Well, ... you found your way to this blog site: you can browse and look it up for yourself.
You will need to have Google set to the feature "Safe Search Off".
(Ah, there is an implicit morality that this culture offers. Unsafe = Sex is the hidden message...)

Look around, but when you do so:
pay attention to your own emotional responses, while you browse through the images of this social taboo zone. It is through your emotional responses that you can become aware of the way yiour cultural imprin has affected your reaction - by Conditioned response - to your own natural being.

PENIS
199000 pictures in 0.07 seconds
(That is about 5x what "Vagina" brought up)

Again, two rows of pics give a clear image of the way our society sees in pricks.

www.angelfire.com/de3/funny/penis.jpg shows penis.jpg which again makes the making jokes of sex win out on reliable information, as above.

Again we immediately can see that humans are not the only life forms with a penis, and animal penile potentials and problems. This time it is the image of a boar penis offered by the university of Iowa State, and concerns animal breeding. (http://www.vetmed.iastate.edu/departments/vdpam/swine/basics/anatomy/repro/labels/AI%20boar%20penis%20erecting%20label.JPG) Now, that's a redirector for ya.

The Penis Website, yes it does exist, goves - for those who know - a direct image of the interrelatedness between the penis and the clitoris. (Sorry guys, the penis is but an overgrown clitoris.) the curious name of the picture is 2.jpg

That the penis is a natural shape (in fact a flow form) is shown in the jockular picture on the pudreteflanders blogspot, with the image of a female body seen from above, showing the shape of the penis. Perhaps the caption question was phrased the wrong way around and should read: "Why does the shape of the penis resemble the female body". The link itself is crippled.

members.internettrash.com/meesha/penis.jpg brings us back in the realm of the artists impressions, which again does not really help more of the nature of the penis, but brings it into the realm of (artistic) discussion.

That nature is more varied than medical text books imagine is seen in an illustration from the Virtual Hospital showing a double penis.

Again the 8th picture cannot be found. It is of a male presumably harvard student, entitled penis nose.
Just as an informative aside: Technically the penis has the same internal
structure as a banana: 3 partitions.
As above: while you browse the pictures that are available on the image search, look as much at your emotions - i.e. the reactions by your mental conditioning - as the pictures. All that you see is pixels; all that you perceive is pricks and such. But what meaning you give it is totally by your own making. Sex simply is.


BREAST
284000 pictures in 0,05 seconds
MAMMAE
184 pictures in 0,21 seconds (which shows you how much longer the official terminology takes to find your way around)
TEAT
5410 pictures in 0.11 seconds (most of milk-industry udders)
TIT
588000 in 0.06 seconds (with only one bird on the first sheet of pictures)

The reason for the big big-breast obsession by males (and thereby by females) is a topic in itself; again it has much to do with the breast being hidden.

(Was it the mother of Livius, the Roman author, who commented about the women of Florence: "It is a shame, one cannot find one's son a decent women, with their teats covered".?)

CLITORIS
8,540 pictures in 0,07 seconds
CLIT
28100 pictures in 0.04 seconds (which would presumably include the Clitoris finds)

As you will discover, very few of the total number of images lead to web sites that are educationsl.
Oh, they are educational all right, but not in the real pragmatic sense. You will find blogs and sites where young lads ask each other what a clitoris looks like, where it or the g-spot can be found. The indirectness of the conversation is a give-away of the ignorance that prevails on the subject. One suggested "ask her". But how few adolescent lads have a "she" they can ask? Their mother or sister? Their granny? Just look at the internal emotional associations that pop up in your mind with the shere thought.
But how then can these youngsters learn?

Fortunately there is the Internet.
And the INTERNET SEX sites.

Perhaps it is time that the moral police are educated about the education
that they fail to provide. Due to this young lads and lassies fail to get the
understanding of their own life and body, and need to fumble around on the
internet. They have a much greater chance to run into sites where the sights are explicit, but do not explain. Do not explain that sex is normal.
Most internet sites d
o not explain that most people have the same question as the youngsters themselves, for the simple reason that people do not (enough) discuss the topic. And, when they do, more often make it vulgar and onscene; which sex is not.

No comments:

Search This Blog

Followers